• Home
  • About
    • Game-Based Consensus Statement
  • IAB
  • Learning
    • Research
    • Resources
  • Events
    • 40th Anniversary >
      • 40th Anniversary Webinars
      • Special Blogs
      • 40th Anniversary Conference
    • Next Major Event >
      • 8th International Conference
    • Past Events >
      • PHYSEDagogy PE Summit 4.0
      • International TGfU Conferences >
        • 1st International Conference
        • 2nd International Conference
        • 3rd International Conference
        • 4th International Conference
        • 5th International Conference
        • 6th International Conference
        • 7th International Conference
      • AIESEP Conferences >
        • 2023 AIESEP Chile
        • 2021 AIESEP Banff
        • 2018 AIESEP Edinburgh
        • 2014 AIESEP Auckland
        • 2010 AIESEP A Coruna
        • 2006 AIESEP Jyvaskyla
      • Other GBA Conferences
      • Workshops >
        • TGfU & Physical Literacy
        • World Symposium
    • Projects >
      • Applying TGfU
      • 2016 Projects >
        • Name Change
        • New Constitution
        • Projects
      • Current Projects >
        • Leadership Fellow Program
        • Video Project Proposal
      • IAB Projects >
        • Games in times of restricted mobility
        • Professional Development Project
    • Event Awards
  • Social Media
    • Blog
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
  • News
    • Commemoration of Len Almond
    • Commemoration of Alan Launder
    • Commemoration of Joy Butler
    • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
    • Recommend a Resource
TGfU.Info
Contact Us

Games Based Coaching Approaches

9/1/2019

0 Comments

 
By Nick Hill

Website:         www.nickhillcoaching.com
Email:              nickhill@nickhillcoaching.com

Twitter:           @NH_Coaching_
Instagram:      nick_hill_coaching_dot_com
Skype:             nick.hill.2012


​If you look around you will find numerous labels that come under the umbrella of Games Based Coaching which depends where in the world you are, what camp you sit in, or what book you are trying to sell. You will see Teaching Games for Understanding, Game Sense, Tactical Games Approach, Constraints-based Approach, and Play with Purpose as examples out there. From my experiences they are all the same to me, it just depends which context I am in. Hence why I call them “Conditioned Games”.
 
For example, if I am in a Physical Education lesson introducing a new game to pupils I will use more of a Teaching Games for Understanding approach. Then if I am in an after school practice I will use Game Sense coaching as the players already know and understand the basics of the game. Then if I am coaching adults in the evening then I will use a Constraints-based Approach based on how I build my Practice Design.
 
 
An example of a Game for Understanding would be… in Softball. Developing the basic understanding of Striking and Fielding Games to pupils new to them.
 
First up, I would ask the pupils “What are the names of some Striking & Fielding Games out there…?” “What are the key features in those games…?” I would do this to seek what prior knowledge they already have and go from there.
 
I would leave a pile of equipment on the ground, e.g. different types of balls, a few different types of bats, and some markers to act as bases, and then I would split the group up into mini groups. I would then ask each group to go and set-up their fields and start playing a game for at least 5 minutes.
 
The basic rules I would give in the beginning would be:-
  • Batters: If you hit the ball you must run. To score a run you have to touch all the bases.
  • Pitcher/Bowler: The ball has to bounce. Every pitch/ball you have to use a different ball.
 
 
An example of using Game Sense would be… in Cricket. Developing Onside and Offside shots in Batting.
 
I would set up an area of 4 fields with the wickets being on the edges in the corner of each field, and placed about 15 yards apart. The 4 shots that the Batsman are looking to make are a Cover Drive, a Square Cut, a Pull, and a Hook.
Picture
​I would create 4 different teams. Each team will bowl on a different field to their batters. The other 3 teams are fielders against the other teams.
 
The basic rules I would give in the beginning would be:-
  • Batsman: If the ball crosses the two outside lines of the corner of the field then they are out.
  • Bowlers: The ball has to bounce inside the big hula hoop. (This is to facilitate the different types of shots so that the bounce of the ball will provide opportunities for the Batsman to hit the desired shot.)
 
 
An example of using Constraints would be… in Rugby. Developing Counter Attack play.
 
I would play a Conditioned Game between the two 22m lines acting as the try lines. There would be 3 groups. One group would be in red bibs, another group would be in blue bibs, and then a small third group of players would be in orange bibs, and would always stay on the attacking team. The attacking team would have 2 rucks to score a Try. If a 3rd ruck occurred then the defending team could steal the ball and start Counter Attacking. The players in the orange bibs would then swap sides. A “tackle” would be a good grab, and the ball carrier and the “tackler” would both fall to the ground. The ball carrier would then roll and place the ball. 2 other defenders would then come into the “breakdown” and do 2 push-ups before defending again. A progression would be the attacking team would have to make a Box Kick on the 3rd ruck instead of a breakdown turnover.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    TGfU SIG Executive

    This blog has been set up in response to the growing interesting in developing a global community for discussions on game-based approaches in Physical Education and Sport. The following pedagogical approaches have been identified with game-based approaches: Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU), Play Practice, Game Sense, Tactical Games approach, Games Concept approach, Tactical Games Model, Tactical Decision Learning model, Ball Schulle and Invasion Games Competence model.


    Archives

    December 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    February 2014
    June 2013
    May 2013
    June 2011
    May 2011
    October 2010


​© COPYRIGHT 2020 AIESEP TGfU Special Interest Group
Picture
Administration Only:  Executive space 
                                       IAB Space