• Home
  • About
    • Game-Based Consensus Statement
  • IAB
  • Learning
    • Research
    • Resources
  • Events
    • 40th Anniversary >
      • 40th Anniversary Webinars
      • Special Blogs
      • 40th Anniversary Conference
    • Next Major Event >
      • 8th International Conference
    • Past Events >
      • PHYSEDagogy PE Summit 4.0
      • International TGfU Conferences >
        • 1st International Conference
        • 2nd International Conference
        • 3rd International Conference
        • 4th International Conference
        • 5th International Conference
        • 6th International Conference
        • 7th International Conference
      • AIESEP Conferences >
        • 2023 AIESEP Chile
        • 2021 AIESEP Banff
        • 2018 AIESEP Edinburgh
        • 2014 AIESEP Auckland
        • 2010 AIESEP A Coruna
        • 2006 AIESEP Jyvaskyla
      • Other GBA Conferences
      • Workshops >
        • TGfU & Physical Literacy
        • World Symposium
    • Projects >
      • Applying TGfU
      • 2016 Projects >
        • Name Change
        • New Constitution
        • Projects
      • Current Projects >
        • Leadership Fellow Program
        • Video Project Proposal
      • IAB Projects >
        • Games in times of restricted mobility
        • Professional Development Project
    • Event Awards
  • Social Media
    • Blog
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
  • News
    • Commemoration of Len Almond
    • Commemoration of Alan Launder
    • Commemoration of Joy Butler
    • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
    • Recommend a Resource
TGfU.Info
Contact Us

The use of game-based teaching as a route to address gender issues in physical education

10/1/2020

0 Comments

 
​By Dr Aspasia Dania and Panagiotis Stasinos
(Assistant Professor in Physical Education Teaching) and ​(PE teacher in public Greek Physical Education)
​In many countries worldwide, there are inequalities in the opportunities given to girls compared to boys for participation in Physical Education (PE). Scientific data show that while girls' biological diversity is not an obstacle to their participation in any sporting activity, social diversity undoubtedly affects it negatively. School plays a very important role in the reproduction of gender inequalities and by the time girls reach adolescence, they already behave as individuals with a socially defined gender identity. School PE in particular, is an important and dynamic space for the construction of gender identity and numerous studies have shown that female participation in PE games and/or activities becomes lower as girls move on to graduation. The existence of body, strength and ability stereotypes within PE classes result in a lack of encouragement for girls, who perceive they are not so able so as to look up to their teachers’ expectations, and thus choose to be “competent by-standers”.

The issue of youth participation in PE and sport is definitely an issue that needs to be redefined, especially in regard to equity principles and PE teachers’ role is pivotal to this direction. In many countries, in service PE teachers’ professional development on gender issues lacks theoretical understandings and practical resources, limiting thus their abilities and skills to design and implement gender-neutral classes and/or activities. The fact that within many Physical Education Teacher Education departments practical courses are taught in purely male or female groups, constraints undergraduates’ experiences and ways of understanding. Further, the establishment of mixed gender PE classes at school not only fails to reverse the above situation, but in many cases may contribute to the reproduction of stereotypes, both by novice and experts in the field.

Empowering girls and young women through PE and sport is a major educational issue that has to be resolved by starting from small-scale changes in curriculum content and instructional methods. The use of game-based instructional models could address gender access and participation imbalances within, ensuring their holistic learning and providing specific tailored support when needed. Game-based models place the student at the center of the learning process, by providing equal opportunities for participation, improvement and progress, within specifically designed game contexts that positively challenge their thinking, feeling and acting behaviors and/or habits. A positive aspect of game based model teaching concerns the way that group formation and teamwork issues are resolved (i.e. developmentally appropriate activities, small-sided games, questioning and challenges at a group level), something that can positively affect girls' participation rates and minimize feelings of helplessness or failure in a co-educational classrooms. Compared to traditional “one-size-fits all” PE classrooms, modified games can ensure fair play and multiple opportunities for participation, challenging stereotypes about which sports or activities are considered male or female.
​
Depending on our role as PE teachers and teacher educators, we advocate for the promotion of equality and social justice within our classes, so that student wellbeing is empowered regardless of their gender and abilities. Game-based instructional models could be a relevant framework for redesigning a gender-neutral PE curriculum, especially due to their emphasis on developing students’ knowledge, skills, character, and meta-learning abilities. The latter are considered as important dimensions for educating versatile 21st century learners who will effectively cope with the societal, economic and personal level challenges of the modern world with poise and resilience.
0 Comments
    Picture

    TGfU SIG Executive

    This blog has been set up in response to the growing interesting in developing a global community for discussions on game-based approaches in Physical Education and Sport. The following pedagogical approaches have been identified with game-based approaches: Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU), Play Practice, Game Sense, Tactical Games approach, Games Concept approach, Tactical Games Model, Tactical Decision Learning model, Ball Schulle and Invasion Games Competence model.


    Archives

    December 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    February 2014
    June 2013
    May 2013
    June 2011
    May 2011
    October 2010


​© COPYRIGHT 2020 AIESEP TGfU Special Interest Group
Picture
Administration Only:  Executive space 
                                       IAB Space