• Home
  • About
    • Game-Based Consensus Statement
  • IAB
  • Learning
    • Research
    • Resources
  • Events
    • 40th Anniversary >
      • 40th Anniversary Webinars
      • Special Blogs
      • 40th Anniversary Conference
    • Next Major Event >
      • 8th International Conference
    • Past Events >
      • PHYSEDagogy PE Summit 4.0
      • International TGfU Conferences >
        • 1st International Conference
        • 2nd International Conference
        • 3rd International Conference
        • 4th International Conference
        • 5th International Conference
        • 6th International Conference
        • 7th International Conference
      • AIESEP Conferences >
        • 2023 AIESEP Chile
        • 2021 AIESEP Banff
        • 2018 AIESEP Edinburgh
        • 2014 AIESEP Auckland
        • 2010 AIESEP A Coruna
        • 2006 AIESEP Jyvaskyla
      • Other GBA Conferences
      • Workshops >
        • TGfU & Physical Literacy
        • World Symposium
    • Projects >
      • Applying TGfU
      • 2016 Projects >
        • Name Change
        • New Constitution
        • Projects
      • Current Projects >
        • Leadership Fellow Program
        • Video Project Proposal
      • IAB Projects >
        • Games in times of restricted mobility
        • Professional Development Project
    • Event Awards
  • Social Media
    • Blog
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
  • News
    • Commemoration of Len Almond
    • Commemoration of Alan Launder
    • Commemoration of Joy Butler
    • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
    • Recommend a Resource
TGfU.Info
Contact Us

How can Teaching Games for Understanding and Sport Education be combined? Practical tips for Primary School

1/2/2022

0 Comments

 
By Dr Eva Guijarro
University of Castilla-La Mancha and University of La Rioja


Twitter: @eguijarro_pe
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eva-Guijarro-Jareno
There is an increasing number of publications focusing on the combination of Teaching Games for Understanding and Sport Education (Alexander et al., 2021 as an example). However, what do we have to take into account at a practical level to use this combination with Primary School students? In this short blog, I will provide some practical tips I employed during a specific invasion game (basketball) with fourth and fifth grade students (9-11 years old).
I will outline the importance of developing respectful relationships to foster a healthy class environment, to consider group sizes and their associated benefits and limitations when posing questions for learning and encouraging autonomy at both team and student level.
For specific results about this learning experience, visit the recently published paper of Guijarro et al. (ahead of print) in the Journal of Teaching in Physical Education.

1. Developing respect and fair play:

​It is essential for this combination of models to work together to develop students’ respect for their team, for other teams, and for the referee.
First, students must respect other teams when playing small-sided games. They have to understand that they cannot interrupt other teams’ practice while they are playing, and if they lose the ball, they should wait at the side of their home area to recover it. This aspect will facilitate the organization in class and the correct development of small-sided games. Second, we have to teach students to respect other teams and the referee. If there are no other teams to play with, there is no basketball. In addition, the decisions of the referee have to be respected by all the players, but referees must preserve their neutrality and not be influenced by friendships. These aspects will create a healthy environment in the class. Some specific strategies can be used:
Picture
Figure 1. Some strategies for using in relation to fair play.
2. Increasing the possibilities of questioning:
​
When we use a combined use of Teaching Games for Understanding and Sport Education, a question that might come to our head is “How do I incorporate questioning? To the whole group, team by team…
The table below lists different ways in which questioning can be incorporated during mixed gender and ability teams (suggested by Sport Education), and some of the benefits and limitations for each one. The use of the different ways can change through the season and might depend on students’ progression or the organization of the class.
Picture
3. Challenging students:
Progression of tactics and skills: from easy to an increased difficulty.
Teaching Games for Understanding and Sport Education are grounded on constructivist theories, hence previous students’ knowledge must be considered. It is important to integrate new tactics and skills based on students’ previous experiences.
This section will focus on two levels.
(a)   At the team level: when a degree of autonomy is achieved, students can select the game to play from a proposed dossier of games or create their own games. Figure 2 shows an example of two different games that students can select for achieving a specific purpose. 

Picture
Figure 2. Two games for maintaining the possession of the ball with different complexity.
(b)   At the students’ level (‘Let the students know each other’): within Sport Education, teams are heterogeneous, which makes it difficult to adapt the games to all team members' requirements. During the practice in a complete season, as the students in each team get to know each other we can help them by providing the opportunity to decide how they want to play in a game. For example, ‘How do you prefer to receive a pass?’ In Figure 3, an example on passing and receiving is proposed. Pass and reception are essential skills that can make a connection among the members of the teams. This aspect is essential, especially in invasion games. Within this strategy, students get to know each other, although they will not always receive the same kind of pass, this will change during the games (especially according to the game dynamic and the progression on students’ skills).
Picture
Figure 3. Let the students know each other. Pass and reception.
In addition, the inclusion of specific rules will be helpful (e.g., inclusion of safety zones in which the ball cannot be stolen, all the students touch the ball before scoring).
 
In conclusion, several aspects must be considered in the application of the combination of Teaching Games for Understanding and Sport Education Model. First, it is important to develop respectful relationships to create a healthy class environment, which allows the season to run as intended. Since there are different levels of ability or motivation in class, it is important that the activities or games are adapted do everyone’s abilities. Finally, from the teacher’s perspective, it is essential to consider how questioning will be incorporated, especially considering the size of the group and students’ development.

References
Gil-Arias, A., Harvey, S., García-Herreros, F., González-Víllora, S., Práxedes, A., and Moreno, A. (2021). Effect of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit on elementary students’ self-determined motivation in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 27(2), 366-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20950174

Guijarro, E., MacPhail, A., González-Villora, S., and Arias-Palencia, N. M. (ahead of print). Exploring Games Performance and Game Involvement: Effects of a Sport Education Season and a Combined Sport Education – Teaching Games for Understanding Unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0170 

Harvey, S., Kirk, D., and O’Donovan, T. M. (2014). Sport Education as a pedagogical application for ethical development in physical education and youth sport. Sport, Education and Society, 19(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.624594

0 Comments
    Picture

    TGfU SIG Executive

    This blog has been set up in response to the growing interesting in developing a global community for discussions on game-based approaches in Physical Education and Sport. The following pedagogical approaches have been identified with game-based approaches: Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU), Play Practice, Game Sense, Tactical Games approach, Games Concept approach, Tactical Games Model, Tactical Decision Learning model, Ball Schulle and Invasion Games Competence model.


    Archives

    December 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    February 2014
    June 2013
    May 2013
    June 2011
    May 2011
    October 2010


​© COPYRIGHT 2020 AIESEP TGfU Special Interest Group
Picture
Administration Only:  Executive space 
                                       IAB Space